New Forum Logo

The Equestrian Forum of Wellington Board is pleased to present its new logo.

It represents an effort to brand the Forum and to establish, for our members, a voice for Wellington's equestrian community.

We are grateful that our membersship grows daily. The great geographic and socio-economic diversity of our membership represents the fact that Wellington's equestrian industry is global in reach. The Forum will continue to support equestrian venus and events for Wellington's equestrian preserve. It is our goal to support the growth of equestrian sport so that economic and job opportunities are created and that property values in the Preserve are enhanced.

Equestrian.Forum@live.com

Important 9/11 Equestrian Preserve Committee Meeting

Dear Members and Supporters,

The development application for the Global Dressage venue at Equestrian Village will be considered at the September 11, 2013 meeting of the Equestrian Preserve Committee. It is an open meeting and the public is encouraged to attend.  The meeting will be held at Village Hall at 6:00 pm.

As a recap, the Global Dressage venue is composed of an international dressage ring, covered arena, stables, derby field and supporting infrastructure. It has hosted two Global Dressage Festivals and other events during the 2012 and 2013 seasons. 

Although the venue was already built and operational, the Village Council revoked all approvals in May 2012. 

As was the case in 2013, the 2014 Global Dressage Festival will be held using a seasonal "Special Use Permit". 

The EPC meeting initiates a process to settle the litigation between Wellington Equestrian Partners and the Village over the revocation of approvals. WEP is seeking to use the facility year-round and to continue to hold the annual Global Dressage Festival, derbies and other competitions and activities for which the venue was originally approved and which have been held for two years on a temporary basis. 

The approval applications will also be reviewed by the Planning, Zoning & Adjustment Board prior to the Village Council voting on the project. You will be notified of these meetings.

If you would like to receive the agenda package for the EPC meeting please email us at : 

Equestrian.Forum@live.com

Lawsuit Settlement Discussion on Wellington Council Agenda - May 28th 2013

By: Lauren Miro

The battle over the use of the Equestrian Village property could be settled next week with the Wellington Village Council expected to discuss a settlement offer to curb its legal woes.

A discussion of the issue is on the agenda for the council’s Tuesday, May 28 meeting, Village Attorney Laurie Cohen told the Town-Crier this week.

The settlement offer could halt two lawsuits filed last year by Wellington Equestrian Partners (WEP), who run the Global Dressage Festival held at Equestrian Village during the winter show season.

“What’s going to be discussed [at the meeting] is a way to resolve these matters,” Cohen said.

At the site of the old Palm Beach Polo stadium at the corner of South Shore Blvd. and Pierson Road, the Equestrian Village site was originally envisioned to have commercial elements and a hotel. However, the only portion of the site that has been constructed is the existing dressage facility.

In May of last year, a newly seated council majority voted to revoke two measures that were approved by the former council: the property’s master plan and conditional use approvals.

WEP Managing Partner Mark Bellissimo filed the lawsuits after the revocations of the existing permits, which had allowed a show facility on the property and year-round use. An attempt was made last year by Bellissimo to settle the issue, but council members ultimately rejected his proposal and the issue moved forward in court.

The decision caused concern for the 2013 dressage season in Wellington, even launching an advocacy group to urge the council to approve use of the facility for the season.

Ultimately, council members and WEP came to an agreement to allow activity on the site for a certain number of show dates.

“They were allowed to use the property for certain dates,” Cohen said. “But that expired at the end of April.”

The fate of the site’s permanent purpose and design is still being contested in court. If a settlement is reached next week, the property could be used year-round as originally intended.

Bellissimo noted that the temporary permit granted by council members last year does not allow use of the venue for summer shows.

“This economy is not able to make use of [the property] as a summer venue, using the largest covered riding surface in the state,” he said. “It could bring hundreds of horses from all over the state to this community for horse shows.”

Bellissimo said he hopes to see the council’s decision reversed.

“[We] believe that the council should restore the revocation of the venue’s approvals,” Bellissimo said.

Cohen noted that a settlement offer was discussed in a closed session with council members, but could not provide details.

“We’ve had some dialogue, and hopefully this can move in a positive direction,” she said. “It’s a discussion that needs to be had. Hopefully it will be a two-way conversation.”

At the meeting, Bellissimo and his representatives will have a chance to talk to council members about resolving things.

Bellissimo said he hopes to come to a consensus.

“We believe it is in the best interest of all involved to stop the litigation and move forward as a community,” he said.

Florida Senate Letter to the Wellington Council

The foregoing Senator Joseph Abruzzo letter was read to the Wellington Council by Councilman Howard Coates on Tuesday, May 14th 2013.

"This time, ethics commission should not let Wellington Mayor off lightly" - Palm Beach Post Editorial

May 10, 2013

The Palm Beach County Commission on Ethics has a second chance to sanction Wellington Mayor Robert Margolis for accepting an unacceptable cash gift after letting him off the hook.

The commission last week found probable cause to hold a public hearing into allegations that Mr. Margolis violated the county ethics code by taking $2,500 from Neil Hirsch. He is a former lobbyist who opposed developer Mark Bellissimo’s proposed equestrian village project.

The project was the major issue in last year’s municipal elections. The billionaire Jacobs family, part time residents whose estate abuts Mr. Bellissimo’s land, spent a record $500,000 to elect Mr. Margolis and councilmen Matt Wilhite and John Greene. The three have also enjoyed the largess of other equestrian village opponents who donated to their legal defense fund after the original election tally erroneously had Mr. Wilhite and Mr. Green losing.

Mr. Margolis, whose victory was never in doubt, set up the legal defense fund last May, two months after the election had been settled. He received $4,000 from Victoria McCullough, an opponent of the equestrian village, and $2,500 from Mr. Hirsch, a director at the time of the Wellington Equestrian Preservation Alliance. The alliance is funded solely by Lou Jacobs and run by Mat Forest, a lobbyist for the Jacobs’ business interests.

Days after receiving Mr. Hirsch’s check, Mr. Margolis voted to halt the equestrian village project. The ethics commission voted 3-1 to find probable cause that the vote was quid pro quo for the donation.

That is an improvement over the commission’s action in February, when the members found probable cause that Mr. Margolis violated the ethics code by accepting money from Ms. McCullough but dismissed the complaint because Mr. Magolis said he would return the cash. The commission bought the dubious claim that Ms. McCullough’s July check was a replacement for one she wrote in March that would not have violated the code because Mr. Margolis wasn’t sworn in until April.

There is no such cover story to explain away Mr. Hirsch’s check, which violates a prohibition against lobbyists giving public officials more than $100. Commissioner Robin Fiore said that Mr. Margolis has exhibited a pattern of “not doing due diligence.”

She was too kind. The pattern is one of blatant disregard for the ethics Mr. Margolis campaigned to uphold. The commission should impose the harshest penalty.

Rhonda Swan

for The Palm Beach Post

 

Judge Approved the Global Dressage Complex Permit

Wellington Equestrian Partners continues to be successful in the lawsuits over the Equestrian Village project. Last week there was a ruling in favor of WEP in a lawsuit filed by the Jacobs. In their lawsuit the Jacobs were trying to have the courts overturn the Water Management District permitting of the project and require that the entire venue be torn down (covered arena, barns, dressage arena and derby field). The courts ruled that the WMD approvals of the project were issued properly. 

An appeals court had previously ruled in favor of WEP on another Jacobs lawsuit.  In that action the Jacobs contested the original approvals issued by the Village of Wellington for the project. The courts, however, have yet to rule on the litigation in which WEP is seeking to overturn the Village's revocation of approvals for Equestrian Village. Success by WEP in this action will re-establish their ability to use the facility year-round as originally granted by the Village. The Forum might be calling on the equestrian community to attend a Village council meeting to express support for allowing the use of Equestrian Village year-round and in accordance with the original approval.  

PRESS RELEASE

Judge Approves the Global Dressage Complex Permit Wellington, FL - April 28, 2013 - On April 26, 2013, Administrative Law Judge Gary Early issued an Order finding, among other things, that the Global Dressage Complex ("GDC") has met, and in some cases, exceeded applicable South Florida Water Management District ("SFWMD") permitting regulations. Judge Early found that the evidence presented at Trial demonstrated that the GDC project proposal provided reasonable assurances that all applicable SFWMD stormwater management, water quality, and Best Management Practices ("BMP") standards were met. Charles and Kimberly Jacobs (the "Jacobs") filed a legal challenge to the issuance of the GDC Permit. The Jacobs claimed that the GDC facilities were inadequate to accommodate the number of horses expected to use the facilities. Judge Early ruled that the Jacobs "...provided no basis for the supposition other than speculation." The Judge found that the GDC's horse-washing facilities were more than adequate. Moreover, the Judge concluded that the GDC's BMP Plan was "...more advanced than the minimum requirements of the Village of Wellington, and more stringent than BMPs approved for other equestrian facilities in Wellington." "This ruling is a huge step forward in ensuring that the Global Dressage Complex is a worldwide, premier equestrian event venue," stated Mark Bellissimo. "The Global Dressage Complex events bring thousands of visitors and event participants to the Village of Wellington each year and create significant benefits for the Village and the Palm Beach County economy." CONTACT: John Fumero, Esquire: 561-315-4595 Please visit www.equestriansport.com or call 561-793-5867 for more information.

Editorial: Now Playing: " The Real Council Members of Wellington "

By Rhonda Swan

Palm Beach Post Staff Writer

Those catty “housewife reality” shows have nothing on the histrionics of the Wellington village council when trying to conduct what should be routine business.

Take Monday’s special meeting to discuss hiring a village attorney. Councilman John Greene asked for the meeting because he had to leave early on April 15, when the council voted to negotiate with Laurie Cohen. The council couldn’t reach an agreement with first choice Don Dufresne because he wanted a $325,000 compensation and benefits package. The village wanted to pay between $150,000 and $175,000.

Mr. Greene said he felt excluded, and the meeting devolved into a forum about his hurt feelings. “I do feel slighted,” he said. “And I do feel like my vote is a little less important than everybody else’s.” Anne Gerwig, who with Howard Coates is often on the losing side of votes, noted that she also feels at times that her vote doesn’t count.

Mr. Greene wanted the council to reopen negotiations with Mr. Dufresne. It’s unclear why Mr. Greene is intent on giving Mr. Dufresne the job. Mr. Dufresne, though, has represented Neil Hirsch, owner of the Players Club and a long-time friend of Mr. Greene’s. As a board member of the Palm Beach County Sheriff’s Foundation, where Mr. Greene works as a fundraiser, Mr. Hirsch is also Mr. Greene’s boss.

Mr. Greene made a motion to reject Ms. Cohen’s contract, which had yet to be discussed, in an effort to bring the discussion back to Mr. Dufresne, who was present and had apparently changed his mind about negotiating. Matt Wilhite seconded the motion, but it failed when Mayor Bob Margolis, Mr. Coates and Ms. Gerwig dissented.

Mr. Greene, whose face by then had turned red, stormed out like a child leaving the playground and taking his ball. “My vote doesn’t really matter, I guess,” he said as he stuffed papers in a folder. “You guys have a quorum.”

The remaining council members discussed Ms. Cohen’s contract. On Tuesday, the council voted to hire Ms. Cohen 3-2, with Mr. Greene and Mr. Wilhite dissenting. She starts Monday.

The village has been without a permanent attorney since November, when Mr. Greene, Mr. Wilhite and Mr. Margolis made the irresponsible decision to fire Jeff Kurtz, who had been with the village for 10 years, for no valid reason and with no plan for filling the position. The village faces numerous lawsuits.

Mr. Coates noted then that the decision was “reckless” and motivated only by the councilors’ inexplicable dislike of Mr. Kurtz. Mr. Coates warned Village Manger Paul Schofield that he might be next on their hit list. Mr. Coates said, “This is going to be a long four years if we keep having issues like this that come up for no really good reason.” Indeed. Village residents deserve better than this catty drama.

Rhonda Swan

for The Post Editorial Board